Creative and strategic PR, social media, other digital things, events, video, content optimization. Guided by analytics. Usually way more effective by lots of different measures.
Vojtech Horna
If you attended any of the Big Data Week sessions (Atomic was a partner of the event) or recently read an article about big data, it most likely started with a startling figure about the volume of data. It probably discussed the millions of conversations, the terabytes of data we create or an example of a company drowning and unable to cope with the ever increasing size of data. Yet, that’s the least interesting part of big data.

Most organisations are not drowning in data, they have completely manageable volumes. If you are from a company that’s not the size of Amazon or the BBC, you might feel like the big data conversation is not about you. Wrong. In fact, some of our start-up clients are the best at getting value out of big data. They know that size doesn’t matter; the real value of big data is in being able to connect the dots.
Once you stop worrying about the volume, you can focus on the more interesting bit: bringing all the different types of data together. It has happened to a certain extent on the sales and marketing side where companies track the customer journey by joining up web traffic, advertising, promotional codes and connecting them with sales or referrals stats. By joining those data sets together, they see what their customers do before they make a purchase. More importantly, they have insights they can act on and measure.
In PR, big data extends the customer journey. Rather than tracking a customer from the time of a first search or visit to a website, we can start looking at and influencing the decision process much earlier. When today’s customer walks into your store or visits your website, they’ve probably already made their decision, talked to their friends, read recommendations on social networks, read reviews online, done their research. Big data PR can uncover, influence and measure the decision process early on.
Once you overlay web traffic data, search analysis, Facebook Insights, media coverage analysis, competitor research on top of sales data, leads, referrals and other internal statistics, you will be able to uncover patterns and start influencing them.
As our client Nick Halstead from DataSift likes to say, the original meaning of big data was about integrating varied data sets to derive a new meaning, so stop thinking about the size, start connecting the dots and discover big data insights that will change your business (and PR).
Five ways to get started:
1. Get access to Google Analytics and sales data and overlay that data with your media coverage timeline to discover which media had the most impact.
2. Most URLs shared on social media are shortened via services like Bit.ly. Did you know that if you take any Bit.ly link and add a plus sign to it, you’ll get statistics on how many people clicked on it (not just shared, liked, etc.)? Use it to track how your competitors are doing and which campaigns/links are driving most traffic.
3. Run an SEO analysis to discover which links are having the most impact for you, but also what is impacting the organic search of your competitors. Use the insights to target the most influential websites with relevant content.
4. Why are people leaving your website without a sale? Analysis of search terms they use to find you and the pages they visit can uncover why conversion rates are low. You can then tailor PR campaign to address those issues.
5. Reverse engineer your competitors’ strategies by analysing their coverage, click throughs, search campaigns and social presence. Once you have these insights, you can learn from their successes and mistakes, but also find a space that you can own.
For most, the challenge is not managing the volume, but deciding which of the data matters.
By Daniel Cohen
What can PR people learn today from Jakob Nielsen’s theory of participation inequality, originally published seven years ago?
Here’s the theory. In any given online community, 90% of the members are “lurkers”, the inactive who never participate; 9% of the community are “contributors” - they add to previously created content; and 1% of members are the “creators” who account for almost all the action. You can read Nielsen’s full article here.
Over the years I’ve seen the numbers shift by a couple of points - 11% contributors, 88% lurkers for example; it might seem negligible but if your community is sizeable, it can make a big difference.
What can we learn from this theory and what can we do to increase levels of participation? Here’s what Nielsen recommends:
Make it easier to contribute. The lower the overhead, the more people will jump through the hoop. For example, Netflix lets users rate movies by clicking a star rating, which is much easier than writing a natural-language review.
Make participation a side effect. Even better, let users participate with zero effort by making their contributions a side effect of something else they’re doing. For example, Amazon’s “people who bought this book, bought these other books” recommendations are a side effect of people buying books. You don’t have to do anything special to have your book preferences entered into the system. Will Hill coined the term read wear for this type of effect: the simple activity of reading (or using) something will “wear” it down and thus leave its marks — just like a cookbook will automatically fall open to the recipe you prepare the most.
Edit, don’t create. Let users build their contributions by modifying existing templates rather than creating complete entities from scratch. Editing a template is more enticing and has a gentler learning curve than facing the horror of a blank page. [Think Prezi here: part of its beauty is the ability to modify existing templates rather than starting from scratch.]
Reward — but don’t over-reward — participants. Rewarding people for contributing will help motivate users who have lives outside the Internet, and thus will broaden your participant base. Although money is always good, you can also give contributors preferential treatment (such as discounts or advance notice of new stuff), or even just put gold stars on their profiles. But don’t give too much to the most active participants, or you’ll simply encourage them to dominate the system even more.
Promote quality contributors. If you display all contributions equally, then people who post only when they have something important to say will be drowned out by the torrent of material from the hyperactive 1%. Instead, give extra prominence to good contributions and to contributions from people who’ve proven their value, as indicated by their reputation ranking.
And here’s one additional recommendation from us:
Use news flows wisely. Social participation does not live in a vacuum - the vast majority of social conversations are intrinsically linked to the news agenda - hard and soft news, celebrity, sport and on - it’s what gets people talking and reacting. Find natural touch points with the brand and watch the engagement fly.
By Judy Wilks

If you were in any doubt that 2013 was going to be a big year for the ‘second screen’, along came Twitter and its massive acquisition in February of Bluefin, a company that measures social conversations around TV – the ‘Nielsen’ of the social world if you will.
I’ve gathered some interesting second screen facts and stats and put together a quick overview of what we should all know about the topic.
What is it?
Let’s start with the basics, a definition: second screen (or dual screen) refers to the simultaneous use of two screens, typically the TV as primary screen and smartphone, tablet or computer as secondary device. Often people are just multitasking – reading emails while watching the TV, for example – but the exciting part for marketers is complementary usage, where the content of both activities is related. This could include viewers tweeting comments to Question Time or buying the music being played in the programme they are watching.
It’s big, and getting bigger
According to Deloitte UK, 24% of UK viewers already use a second screen device while watching TV and almost half of all 16-24 year olds use communication tools such as messaging, email, Facebook or Twitter to discuss what they are watching on TV. If you look just at owners of mobiles, laptops or tablets, the figures are much higher: 86% access the web while watching TV says Nielsen.
Right now, it’s mostly about driving conversations around a TV programme – but that will change
The UK’s X Factor final generated 1.12 million Tweets from 505,000 unique users. Savvy TV programmes such as the fantastic Great British Bake-off are using official hashtags to drive Twitter conversations – increasing the social conversation by up to 63% according to Brandwatch. No doubt #soggybottom was also trending.
Deloitte UK’s study found that while 40% of viewers like being able to send comments in to a live programme, 68% would not want the websites for products, people or adverts that have just been shown on television to pop up automatically on their second screen. Nevertheless, there’s a huge opportunity for permission-based extended ads and branded experiences, and for producers to offer viewers deeper dives into stories, play-along shows and interactive documentaries.
And if you’re thinking of diving in
At the simplest level, an official hashtag that appears on the bottom of the screen will increase your inclusion in social conversations and searches. Beyond that, the general consensus is that it’s vital to offer viewers an experience that is additive; if all you want them to do is comment or discuss, don’t force them away from their usual social channels. Branded games can work well, together with appropriate incentives. We’ve also seen brands having success recently – not least with this year’s Superbowl – by leveraging live events.
What makes brand owners and marketers really excited about second screen is the massively increased level of engagement with consumers it brings. We’re just now scratching the surface of what can be done. Expect to see huge innovation and lots of experimentation in this area in 2013.
By Andy Getsey
Co-founder of Atomic
There’s always a lot of discussion about how traditional media will be replaced by digital and social media, how journalist produced content will be replaced by branded and citizen produced content, how PR people will be replaced by some other thing. Much of the discussion makes it sound like a switch will be flipped, and suddenly the whole landscape and everyone in it will be these brand new alternative things.
The evolution of science fiction tells us that this idea is wrong.
The future of PR and advertising is and will actually be more like the future portrayed in the movie BladeRunner. I said so as a panelist last week at PRSA Silicon Valley’s meeting on #thefutureofPR. Thanks to all the folks who re-tweeted my comment.
Here’s why it’s true. This is a bit of a generalization and I chose BladeRunner as a super mainstream film example. Others saw something similar – but didn’t mainstream it so hard. The idea still works.
Before BladeRunner, most sci–fi movies (like Dune or Logan’s Run as popular examples) portrayed the future as all tall crystalline towers, airlocks and Jetson–style flying cars, telepathy, ray guns and all sorts of other fantastical things. More often than not, inexplicably, people in the future wore togas back then. WTF?
Beginning sometime before the release of BladeRunner, the future started being portrayed as a mashup. Some buildings are state of the art, modern fortresses of ultracool design. Next door might be old buildings from year 2000; run down. Some communications are completely corporately sponsored, others are renegade. Some media are super modern, but there are also billboards and blimps. Some people are super modern, with bio enhancements, cool weapons and outlandishly modern hair and fashions. Some are regular people with regular weapons. Others are poor, beaten down, old–fashioned people wearing a variety of raggedy clothes that could be from any era where poor people wore raggedy clothes, and really crappy weapons.
The future of PR is turning out to be more like BladeRunner than Logan’s Run. It’s also turning out to be a lot like the adoption curve of radio, TV, email, social networks, etc. They’re all still here – none have totally replaced the other yet. Each still has their place. But some are ascending in importance; others are receding.
Some agencies and clients have great tech; some don’t. Some clients care, others don’t care as much - yet.
It’s just like that with people. Some are super quants. Some are social media mavens. Some are trans-media story tellers. Some are awesome with bloggers. Some are super good at getting on TV and into the New York Times. Some are good with everything. There’s no complete switchover yet. It’s a mix. And most kinds of people still have their place.
But ultimately, in movies and in life - awesome humans with amazing multi-situational skills and advanced weapons are the ones who usually make it into the sequels.
Agree? Disagree? Message me @andygetsey, or email me: andy(at)atomicpr(dot)com.
Also, if you’re interested in being in the sequel – we’re hiring :-)
On Friday, Atomic’s Vojtech and Sinead attended one of Europe’s largest tech events, London Web Summit. Some of the biggest influencers from the UK tech scene were involved and the speaker line-up looked like a list of who’s who in the UK and European tech industry. Here’s their roundup of the day.
By Vojtech Horna
London Web Summit is back again this Friday and brings together everyone who is in some way connected to the UK tech scene from start-ups, established tech companies and government representatives to journalists, Silicon Valley CEOs and investors. They’ll find a London that is quite different from a year or two ago, one with a stronger ecosystem, several success stories, and one that is beginning to realise that Tech City is not just about Shoreditch, nor is it just about tech.

As Olivia Solon wrote in Wired last year, one of the biggest challenges for Tech City has been that its role hasn’t been clearly defined. Maybe it was also because it was in some ways too defined and restrictive. Unless you were a tech start-up, preferably with a consumer product somewhere near Silicon Roundabout, the spotlight of media and government wasn’t on you.
That’s changing. We are starting to see media and investors to realise that Tech City might be about something much bigger than Shoreditch and broader than tech. A lot of innovation is coming from elsewhere in London, Thames Valley, Cambridge and more recently Newcastle, and many of the new start-ups wouldn’t describe themselves as tech.
“With London, it’s not just ‘tech’, it’s finance + tech, fashion + tech, design + tech and so on. These industries are already strong, and technology can help them to become even stronger,” Alex Wood, editor of the recently launched Tech City News, told Atomic. Not many cities and countries can claim to lead in so many industries and start-ups would be foolish not to use it to their advantage.
We will be at London Web Summit and will be cheering for Tech City. However imperfect the name might be, it’s useful to have a name for the ecosystem that is emerging in London and across Britain. We just hope that it becomes just that – a name for the entire ecosystem, not just a geographic area.
Joining us at London Web Summit?
If you are interested in this topic, you might be also interested in attending “The state of the London tech scene” moderated by Martin Bryant from The Next Web. Other things you shouldn’t miss? We asked Alex Wood from Tech City News, previously a producer for Bloomberg, for his recommendations:
“I’m looking forward to hearing about Mike Lynch’s plans after Autonomy, and above else I’m looking forward to how Joanna Shields will set the tone for the rest of the year in Tech City. As a cat lover, I also want to hear about the story behind Ben Huh, and his site Cheezburger,” Alex wrote.
And what will be the most talked about topic? “Although it’s been done to death, there will still be a lot of comparison between London and the Silicon Valley. I hope that with the recent changes announced by the London Stock Exchange, the conversations will move on to more about investments in London-based start-ups and positioning London as the centre for investment in tech across Europe and MENA,” Alex told us.
See you at London Web Summit.
If you would like to meet the Atomic team, tweet us at @atomicpruk. We will be represented by @sinead_pr and @vojtech.
By Andy Crisp

This week it’s Mobile World Congress, and we’ve already seen a flurry of launches promising to change the face of technology.
Yet the fun actually started last week, with two big launches in the consumer technology world, and the advent of a new trend I’m going to coin: the danger launch. A high risk launch event that promises high return.
On Tuesday HTC launched its new HTC One device, with a dual event taking place simultaneously in London and New York. A logistical nightmare, but a great way to create large scale media interest and show UK journalists that they were getting the same scoop as their US counterparts. In fact, there was such interest in the launch that a queue formed outside. Which got fairly long, fairly quickly. And was then documented by journalists who were slightly miffed to be waiting outside in the cold, as this snap by Wall St Journal’s Ben Rooney shows.
After the crowd of journalists got in, there was a further unexpected delay and HTC was forced to make a difficult decision. The New York event went ahead on time, while the UK portion was delayed, prompting Wired’s Nate Lanxon to tweet “I see the HTC One embargo has broken before HTC managed to start its conference.” In spite of all this though, coverage for the new device was glowing, showing that the high-risk dual-event strategy was worth it.
Fast forward just over 24 hours and the cream of the globe’s tech hacks converged on New York (again) for the much anticipated launch of the PS4. Sony came a bit out of nowhere on this one, surprising people who had expected Microsoft’s new X-Box to be the first of the new consoles to emerge.
There was, however, one key element of this launch missing: the product itself. It was the console launch with no console. Not even a picture. A few attendees even took to using the hastily created hashtag #EmperorsNewConsole.
Again though, the risk paid off – the coverage was extensive and everywhere, with some journalists arguing that it wasn’t such a big deal that the console itself wasn’t seen. Mission successful, since consumers were reading about the PS4 before they’d heard anything more than rumours about the new X-Box.
Given the strategic importance of these product launches to HTC and Sony, the events were certainly something of a gamble. The nature of the consumer technology industry is now such that there is a clamour for the latest products, and a huge amount to be gained by getting a launch strategy just right, and getting out there early. Volume sales are driven by excited consumers, and the value of word of mouth is not to be underestimated. Brands such as Sony and HTC, who have a strong brand and technology heritage, can afford to risk upsetting journalists but the danger launch certainly wouldn’t be advised for everyone. To trade off its reputation a company needs to have spent time building one first. It also needs to have a huge amount of faith in its new ‘hero’ product.
All eyes on Barcelona this week to see if anyone else tries a danger launch.

By Daniel Cohen
It seems everyone is talking about social these days. “What’s your favourite way of being social?” “Our new memory stick has the most capacity ever. What is your favourite memory?”
Is the constant stream of meaningless questions from brands across social turning people off?
Looking at engagement levels and applying a healthy dose of common sense I’d say, yes.
So, why do it? Lazy journalism springs to mind or sometimes it’s a case of people just feeling the need to speak when they don’t’ really have anything to say. The sentiment goes something like this, “throw in a question so our audience know we’re active, we’re still here and we’re engaging. We usually get a few likes and comments, so it must be working!”
Here are five things to think about before posting a social question:
1. The lonesome party guest
Think about a party where one person only ever asks questions and never gets into a conversation. Is that the person others flock to? No. The person who attracts followers often has really interesting things to say and share. They are also often good listeners. If you feel like your social presence has become a bit too much like the lonesome guest, review your content plan and, as important, review your F.O.P rate (frequency of post). I just made that acronym up by the way. But I like it, so I’ll keep it.
2. Turn on, tune in but don’t drop out
Politicians are often criticised for going after the lowest common denominator - dumbing down messages to win popularity. Don’t be tempted to fall into the same trap and underestimate your audience. Really think about the content which is going to be enjoyed and shared by the majority. Static shots have a higher sharing propensity so think about the balance of content – short narrative, longer narrative, static shots and videos (and if you’re going for videos, they need to be short, relevant and touch hearts and minds).
3. Are you listening?
Last year I published a paper titled Who’s Listening, the premise being that whilst there are a lot of people talking, it’s getting harder to get people to listen. Think about how this plays out in social channels with the social question. If you’re not spending at least as much time on quality interactions as you are asking questions, your community will find somewhere else more deserving of their time and energy. It’s human nature, pure and simple. If you like the device then use the social question more selectively and frequently engage with responses to show your audience that you are listening.
4. Dialogue or monologue?
A lot of brands employ traditional advertising tactics in their social channels – create content and push it out. It’s like a leader speaking to an audience and not taking any questions at the end. Little interaction, little meaningful engagement but, if the content is strong enough, it will have an impact on the audience. Social though allows for brands to be, well, social. But it’s hard to have a conversation with a lot of people. Use analytics to pinpoint who is the most engaged; look at their spheres of influence and make a decision on how much time to spend engaging with them (they are often less than 1% of your total fan base); then you can focus on the bigger challenges of increasing depth and reach of engagement.
5. Participation inequality
Some years ago I was introduced to Jacob Nielson’s theory and since then I have frequently returned to it with new research in hand to see if it still holds up and I have yet to find fault with it. It states that in most online communities, 90% of users are lurkers who never contribute, 9% of users contribute a little, and 1% of users account for almost all the action. Therefore the vast majority of your audience will never actively participate – the question then becomes what type of participation are you hoping for? Most will not post; some will like; the biggest value is to drive sharing – which brings me back to the social question. People don’t tend to share questions.
By Andy Getsey
Co-founder, Atomic

I was invited to talk at a round table discussion last night about the Future of PR sponsored by PRSA Silicon Valley. The panel was moderated by Steve Barrett, Editor in Chief of PR Week and included David Swain, director of technology comms for Facebook, Kelly MCGinnis, VP comms for Dell, Burghardt Tendrich, formerly Text 100 and Bite, now associate professor at USC’s Annenberg School of Communications and Journalism. And me. Here’s a mashup of my thoughts, and those of the panel and audience - about the critical skills PR practitioners need to acquire as the field advances.
Excellent writing and storytelling skills. More than ever, good thinking, writing and storytelling skills are critical. Brands are now self-publishing all sorts of content, the journalistic media world is more hard pressed for time and bandwidth, and these core professional communications skills are getting more important. Still, many people in the audience feel that people with these critical talents are harder to find than ever.
A healthy understanding of how powerful “traditional” media really are, still. It’s popular among many of the digerati, as well as many social marketers (both groups to which I belong) to propel the idea that traditional media don’t matter any more (a myth I don’t support). Our agency has monitored and analyzed every campaign we’ve ever done over a twelve year period, and I can tell you that we have never had even one single instance where a client’s web site has crashed because of traffic generated exclusively from online buzz. We have dozens and dozens of client sites crash from traffic generated by exposure in traditional media. Sure, their business models are under siege in many cases, but their ability to deliver massive audiences and persuasive impact is still real.
Transmedia skills. People with bright intellect, solid experience, good writing skills, and solid media expertise are always in demand. Add social media, SEO, graphic design, video production, event production and other skills and you are going to another level. If you know how to tell stories and engage audiences in various ways, written, visual, experiential, through search returns, media, social etc, you can write your own ticket. Since the lines between PR and advertising are blurring a bit at the edges – a stint working at an ad or digital agency wouldn’t hurt you either.
Branding expertise. Most of us in PR feel we understand branding, but it’s actually a bit more of a formal discipline than many PR people like to think. Future PR pros will be wise to have some formal education in branding. A good way to get it, especially for students, is to take courses and intern at a pure branding consultancy. For others, there are a number of great books, books on tape and videos about what a brand is and how brands are managed. PR work gets better when it’s informed with a knowledge of the principles of branding that CMOs work with every day. Lack of real understanding shows.
Business savviness. As communicators, we’d all like a place at the table in the C-suite. But business is the language of the C-suite, and we need to understand business in general, the specifics of the client or employer business at hand, and specifically how various communications strategies, programs or events might or will impact the business itself. We need to be able to counsel C-level execs at this level to provide real value at the table. Too many practitioners lead with pure PR- or publicity-driven thinking. Business education or hands-on management experience is usually what it takes to build the knowledge needed to succeed at the table with the C-people.
Sophisticated knowledge of and application of analytics for planning, consulting and program measurement. Most of the conversation about analytics in our industry is about reporting in order to defend the value of programs. Or it’s about listening in on social conversations. That same basic focus was in effect at the PRSA event. There is actually so much more value in applying analytics to forward strategy and planning, in addition to simple listening and reporting. With the volume of noise and data increasing dramatically across all channels, practitioners can elevate their skills considerably by becoming educated in a variety of communications analytics, statistical principles, and especially how to apply analytics and insights to strategy and planning. Don’t just justify to senior execs – lead!
Aggressive curiosity. The industry is changing so fast that we will all do ourselves a big favor by being boundlessly curious, and stretching beyond what we know to acquire broader knowledge, more skills and a wider network. Don’t settle into a groove.
Is the future easier for PR professionals? I’m afraid the answer is no. the present and future are becoming more complicated and demanding. But as a PR professional that started in the industry just as the landscape and dynamics got way more complicated, I can tell you that for those that possess innate curiosity, drive, the willingness to master new skills and adopt new perspectives as the industry evolves, PR and social media offer an incredibly interesting and rewarding career.
What do you think? Ping me at andy(at)atomicpr.com, or @andygetsey on Twitter.
By Judy Wilks
It’s a running joke that people get into PR because they are ‘good with people.’ As the landscape changes around us on a daily basis, it’s not a given that the skills PR people needed even a couple of years ago are the same as today – or tomorrow. So what’s it going to take in the future? What skills should we all be nurturing and what types of people should consider a career in PR?
For inspiration, I took a look at psychologist Howard Gardner’s ‘Five Minds for the Future,’ in which he lays out the kinds of minds he believes people will need in order to thrive in future eras. It was quite astonishing just how applicable they are to PR. So here’s my quick overview of the five minds and how they relate to PR. And before you start trying to figure out which one you are, stop. Everyone should cultivate ALL of these ‘minds,’ says Gardner. Best start practising right now.
Gardner’s five minds are: the disciplined mind, the synthesizing mind, the creating mind, the respectful mind and the ethical mind.
The creating mind seems like an obvious one for PR. Every day we’re asked to come up with new and better ways of doing things, different slants on the same old topic and never-heard-before concepts. To do this, you need a mind that is never happy with the status quo, a mind that constantly questions. But prepare to fail as dramatically as you succeed – never easy for those of us with clients.
Seemingly at odds with the creating mind is the synthesizing mind – the ability to take information from multiple sources, select the crucial bits, dissect it and provide illumination. If ever there were a skill that will become indispensable in the future, it’s this one, folks. Fortunately, I work at an agency that pioneered the use of analytics as a strategy tool for PR so the synthesizing mind is highly prized and cultivated at Atomic.
Next up, the disciplined mind. By this, Gardner means the ability to master a discipline. ‘Without at least one discipline under his belt, the individual is destined to march to someone else’s tune,’ he warns. This seems a little counter to the PR person’s natural inclination to be a jack of all trades, but ultimately is about stickability: take the time to learn and really master skills, and never stop learning.
And finally, the respectful mind and the ethical mind. These two only become more important as time goes on. Now more than ever, we need to understand our many different audiences and their motivations, and engage in dialogue rather than monologue with them. Our world is increasingly transparent, making authenticity, respect and fairness prerequisites in everything we do. If you thought PR was all about ‘spin’ and pulling the wool over people’s eyes, now is the time to change careers.
I’m sure there are many other skills and attributes that the modern PR person needs, but it strikes me that these five will stand us all in good stead and, as Gardner says, equip us ‘to deal with what is expected as well as what cannot be anticipated.’
Loading posts...